UPDATE ON PROGRESS

Ok, I just have the intro and conclusion and abstract left. Saved the hardest for last. Fun.

I seriously don't think I'll be bothered putting all my info up on this so I'll just put sites.

The sites used were as follows:

http://www.brianmac.co.uk/psych.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Basketball
http://www.hoopdepot.com/history-of-basketball.htm
http://www.athleticscholarships.net/history-of-basketball.htm
http://library.thinkquest.org/10615/no-frames/basketball/history.html
http://www.psychology.org.au/community/specialist/sport/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sport_psychology
http://www.girl.com.au/natalie-porter-olympic-basketballer-understands-the-importance-of-her-eyes.htm
http://etd.ohiolink.edu/send-pdf.cgi/Klug%20Justin%20James.pdf?miami1156375861
http://www.usc.edu/CSSF/History/2006/Projects/J0334.pdf
http://www.freepatentsonline.com/7390274.html
http://www.freepatentsonline.com/6746349.html
http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Does_the_presence_or_absence_of_a_net_affect_free-throw_accuracy
http://www.ultimate-youth-basketball-guide.com/basketball-question-on-shooting1.html

The books are as follows:

Jarvis M. (1999) Sport Psychology, St Edmundsbury Press, Sulfolk, p. 2, p.9, p.15
Kremer J. M. D. and Scully D. M (1994) Psychology in Sport, Taylor & Francis Inc., Bristol, p. 114-116, p. 160
World Book Inc. (2008) The World Book Encyclopaedia: Volume 2, World Book Inc., Chicago, USA, p. 151
Kazdin A. E. (2000) Encyclopaedia of Psychology: Book 7, American Psychology Association and Oxford University Press, Oxford, p. 439-453
Magill F. N. (1993) Survey of Social Science: Psychology Series – Volume 6, Salem press, Pasadena, California, p. 2363-2364
Greenfield S. A. (1996) The Human Mind Explained, Reader’s Digest (Australia) Pty Ltd, Surry Hills, Australia

Ok, that's pretty much all the stuff I looked at. I think. Can't keep track. Oh well. MAY I FINISH THIS SRP TONIGHT!!

RESULTS

I've started on my BIG LONG REPORT. I think I'll time how long this will take. I finished the experiment last Thursday, because the rain FINALLY cleared up. I dunno if I need to put all my results and everything up on this but I'll do it anyway. Just in case.

I've also got a whole lot more information from research. I went to the library and found encyclopedias. They have specific encyclopedias on psychology. That was really good. And more websites which have some really useful information.

*4 hours later*

I've finished about half of my report now.

*next day*

Ok well I'm considering putting my research that I had up here, but I'll finish my report first. Not much left. THIS SRP HAS TAKEN AWAY MY LONG WEEKEND. I BETTER FINISH THIS. AND I BETTER DO WELL.

I HATE RAIN.

RAIN IS BAD.
I have some results but I need to do repeats. And the rain isn't letting me. 41 degrees for Duke of Ed Practise, then rain on our test camp. No swimming or athletics carnival in year 7 and first swimming carnival in YEAR 10. Haven't had a year where we've had both carnivals. Everytime I bring an umbrella to school it doens't rain. When I don't it pours. And now with my SRP, it chooses to open the heavens like the rains that purged the world of evil, in "Noah's Ark". My conclusion: the weather hates me.
I DON'T LIKE YOU EITHER!

So, I have some results but I want to put all my results up in one go. So here's a bit more research. And I have decided that I'm just gonna write my permission notes for people doing my experiment.
And thanks to everyone who have consented to help me with my SRP and those who have already come to throw a couple of hoops.

Now...
I went on Google Books, like Ms Zhang suggested. I haven't been able to go to the library as much as I'd like so I'm taking this shortcut.
From Sport Psychology, by Matt Jarvis, there is a lot of information. The history of sport psychology has dated back to almost as early as the first investigations into human psychology. It stated that the first recorded study of sport psycholgy dated back to the end of the ninteenth century. Norman Triplett (1898) is often said to be the person who conducted the very first experiment in sport psychology. He was also cited to have conducted the first experiment in social psychology, which affects sport psychology. Triplett showed that a cyclist would cycle faster when racing against another cyclist, than when riding alone. In the 1920s the discipline of sport psychology was formally established.
Personality plays a very big part in sport psychology. It is possible that certain "personality traits" affect sports performance. There is a theory called "Eysenk Theory" which proposes that personality can be classed by two traits: extroversion and neuroticism. The extroversion trait shows how lively and sociable a person is, while the neuroticism shows the person's emotional stability.
There have been many attempts on trying to use personality traits to identify successful athletes. One of the earliest attempts at doing this was by Ogilvie and Tutko (1966). They proposed eleven traits which successful sportsmen would score highly in. These were: aggression, coachability, conscientiousness, self-confidence, determination, guilt-proneness, emotional control, drive, leadership, trust and mental toughness. This was found to be untrue, but sparked further investigation.
Some studies, with superior personality tests, have found that there are some links between personality and sports ability. Garland and Barry (1990) ran some tests on American college students and found that tough-mindedness, extroversion, group dependence and emotional stability accounted for 29% of the variance in sporting ability. This shows that though personality is one important trait affecting sports performance and psychology, many other factors also contribute to success.

http://books.google.com.au/books?id=8Xy629OzAQsC&printsec=frontcover&dq=sport+psychology&ei=rff8S5CAOIeSkATB9JiQBQ&cd=1#v=onepage&q&f=false

JARVIS, MATT; Sport Psychology p. 2, p.9, p.15

In the book Psychology in Sport by John M. D. Kremer and Deidre M. Scully, again perosnality and sport psychology have connections drawn between them. But there is also information on development and various other aspects contributing to success in sport. One is team cohesion and team spirit. People seem more respectable to group decisions, have a common belief that "Two heads are better than one" and that the team which has the strongest friendships has the best chance of winning. "Team building" is an important part of any team sport, and many sport psychologists stress that it is important for coaches to emphasise team aspirations, rather than individual ones for people to work towards.
As well as that, there is devlopmental psychology, which refers mostly to a child's development in younger ages with sport. All children do not grow and mature at the same rate, and they develop skills at different rates as well. This can lead to difficulty in finding which chiild is ready fpr a formal sprt programme, and which are not. But with early devlopment of sporting skills, and experiencing in playing a certain sport, this can affect a child's thinking in future, when he or she engages in a sport of some sort.

http://books.google.com.au/books?id=_b2nlDMAtfQC&printsec=frontcover&dq=sport+psychology&ei=rff8S5CAOIeSkATB9JiQBQ&cd=3#v=onepage&q&f=false

KREMER, JOHN M. D. and SCULLY, DEIDRE M.; Psychology in Sport p. 114-116, p. 160

There's some information. There are actually a lot of things contributing to succes in sport and sport psychology... so complicated...

Well hopefully I can look more into the exact things that might affect a person on the spot, when they are about to do some sport. Perhaps in relation to basketball. Yes. OK, I'll be back.

THE EXPERIMENT (REVISED)

I haven't actually made much of a change but I've been thinking that it'd be hard to find a lot of people who play basketball with a lot of experience. So I'll have two groups, one who are full of people who have REALLY no experience whatsoever in basketball, and one who is for those who have played basketball a little more. The rest is pretty much the same.
And I REALLY REALLY those permission note thingys, Ms Zhang. Please.

AIM: To find whether the absence or presence of a net affects free throw accuracy in basketball.

HYPOTHESIS: The absence of a net decrease free throw accuracy in basketball.

EQUIPMENT: official NBA sized basketball, basketball court, basketball net, 30 people (15 reasonably experienced players, 15 non-experienced players), recording apparatus

METHOD:
1. Set up basketball court on a clear day, with net attached to hoop on the side facing away from the sun.
2. Have each person shoot at the hoop 10 times from the penalty line.
3. Take the net off the hoop.
4. Have each person shoot at the hoop ten times from the penalty line.
5. Record results, with a separate record for each person, with experience level noted.
6. Repeat the steps 1-5 two more times on different days but under the same conditions.
7. Compare and analyse all the results.

This was based on another experiment I found:

http://www.usc.edu/CSSF/History/2006/Projects/JO334.pdf

And as a spot of extra revision, I found this site:

http://www.ultimate-youth-basketball-guide.com/basketball-question-on-shooting1.html

It stated that "not having a net shouldn't effect the basketball shooting percentage. It changes the way you see the hoop and may make your shoot feel different. You just have to focus on the rim when your shooting and forget that there is not a net on the hoop."

Hopefully next time I come on I can get some results down.

HUMAN PSYCHOLOGY IN SPORTS

Sorry this isn't related but it's just that I need to get it out of my system. I HATE BIEBER!! HE IS A SAD BOY WHO SINGS LIKE A GIRL AND BECAUSE OF SOMEONE I HEARD SOME OF HIS SAD SONGS JUST NOW. AND SHE WILL PAY.

Much better.

Well I've decided to look into human psychology in sports, because when playing sport I believe the mind works differently and becomes more competitive. And maybe if there are cheer squads or people encouraging a player, he or she may perform better. If this is the case I'll have to control this in someway.

Wikipedia defines sport pschology as "the study of a person's behavior in sport." It also states that "It is also a specialisation within the brain psychology that seeks to understand psychological/mental factors that affect performance in sports, physical activity, and exercise and apply these to enhance individual and team performance."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sport_psychology

The above definition tallies with the definition I found on the site of the Australian Psychological Society: Sport psychology - "Sport psychology is the study of psychological and mental factors that influence, and are influenced by, participation in sport, exercise and physical activity, and the application of this knowledge to everyday settings."

"What is sport psychology?" http://www.psychology.org.au/community/specialist/sport/

There is one last site, and this one goes into a fair bit more detail.

There is a thing known to sport psychologists called the 4C's. These are known as concentration, confidence, control and commitment. These are the four points that are considered by sport psychologists as the main mental qualities that are important for successful performance in sports.

Concentration is the mental quality to focus on the task currently being completed. If an athlete lacks concentration then their athletic skils will not be effectively or efficiently applied to the sport. There are two different types of attention focus. Research has identified these as:

•Broad Narrow continuum - the athlete focuses on a large or small number of stimuli
•Internal External continuum - the athlete focuses on internal stimuli (feelings) or external stimuli (ball)

The demand for concentration varies with the sport:

•Sustained concentration - distance running, cycling, tennis, squash
•Short bursts of concentration - cricket, golf, shooting, athletic field events
•Intense concentration - sprinting events, bobsleigh, skiing

Common distractions are: anxiety, mistakes, fatigue, weather, public announcements, coach, manager, opponent, negative thoughts etc.

I think, for my experiment, the people will need short bursts of attention for trying to shoot a basket.

Confidence results from the comparison an athlete makes between the goal they are trying to achieve and their ability (in this case trying to get the ball into the basket). The athlete will have self-confidence if they believe they can achieve their goal.

When an athlete has self confidence they will tend to persevere even when things are not going very well, show enthusiasm, be positive in their approach and take their share of the responsibility in success and fail.

To improve their self confidence, an athlete can use mental imagery to:

•visualise previous good performance to remind them of the look and feel
•imagine various scenarios and how they will cope with them

I'll have to consider the confidence level of the people participating in the experiment, because those who are likely to feel less confident, especially performing in front of players who may appear better, might not perform as well as they could. Repeats of the experiment can help with keeping results accurate, as well as elminating possible factors that induce lower confidence levels.

Control here means emotional control. Identifying when an athlete feels a particular emotion and understanding the reason for the feelings is an important stage of helping an athlete gain control. An athlete's ability to maintain control of their emotions in the face of the opposition and remain positive is essential to successful performance. Two emotions that are often associated with poor performance are anxiety and anger.

• Anxiety comes in two forms - Physical (butterflies, sweating, nausea, needing the toilet)
• Mental (worry, negative thoughts, confusion, lack of concentration)

When an athlete becomes angry, the cause of the anger often becomes the focus of attention. This then leads to a lack of concentration on the task, performance deteriorates and confidence in ability is lost which fuels the anger.

I don't think the control will get too out of hand, as this isn't actually a proper sport against an opposition.

Commitment to numerous goals over many years greatly affects an athlete's sprts performance. In competition with these goals the athlete will have many aspects of daily life to manage. The many competing interests and commitments include work, studies, family/partner, friends, social life and other hobbies.

Within the athlete's sport, commitment can be undermined by:

•a perceived lack of progress or improvement
•not being sufficiently involved in developing the training program
•not understanding the objectives of the training program
•injury
•lack of enjoyment
•anxiety about performance - competition
•becoming bored
•coach athlete not working as a team
•lack of commitment by other athletes

Setting goals with the athlete will raise their feelings of value, give them joint ownership of the goals and therefore become more committed to achieving them.

Many people (coach, medical support team, manager, friends, etc) can contribute to an athlete's levels of commitment with appropriate levels of support and positive feedback, especially during times of injury, illness and poor performance.

Commitment will not be a big issue here. But I have to make sure that the people are trying as hard as possible and are commited to spending the time carrying out the experiment properly.

The 4C's, Concentration, Confidence, Control, Commitment http://www.brianmac.co.uk/psych.htm

I could actually use some of this information for when I go and play sport. Especially for soccer tomorrow. Handy.

More Bits and Pieces

After doing some more research, I've found that there are different types of nets and hoops and different ball sizes. So I'm going to define exactly what equipment I'm going to use.

I'll use a normal nylon string net (not a chain net) connected to a single ring hoop with a backboard.

I'll use a size 7 official size basketball.

It'll be played on a proper court with all the basketball markings, but not in an indoor court.

The people who will be shooting from the penalty line at the hoop. The red dot shows where the person will shoot from on the half court diagram below.

That'll be it for now, but I'll be back soon.

The Graph

FINALLY! That was not fun. But here is that graph thing that we were supposed to put onto our blog. It took me 3 hours and in the end it was really REALLY EASY!!

Bits and Pieces

It's been a while since I've been able to go on to my blog because for some reason my computer wasn't working properly and wouldn't let me get onto blogger. But it's all good now.
I wanted to try and find out exactly what purpose the basketball net served in a game. So I delved a bit into the history of basketball.
Basketball was invented in 1891 by a Canadian clergyman, educator and physician, James Naismith. He was instructed by his superior to invent a new rigorous recreation suitable for playing indoors. So basketball was invented, with 13 original rules, 9 players a side, and played originally with a soccer ball and wooden peach baskets fixed to walls.

http://library.thinkquest.org/10615/no-frames/basketball/history.html

http://www.athleticscholarships.net/history-of-basketball.htm

A peach basket were closed at the bottom, so everytime someone shot a basket someone had to climb up a ladder to retrieve the ball. Soon the peach basket was replaced by metal rims connected to backboards with a net hanging from the rim. In 1906, people started cutting open the netting to let the ball fall through. The ball was changed too, and so the modern basketball we know today was born.

http://www.hoopdepot.com/history-of-basketball.htm

On wikipedia, it added that before the metal rims and nets were brought in, the bottom of the peach baskets were first removed so the ball could be poked out with a long dowel whenever a basket was shot.

The only equipment that is essential to the game is a basketball and a court. The only time a net is realy necessary is in a regulation basketball court in international games.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Basketball#The_first_rules.2C_court.2C_and_game
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Basketball#Equipment

Therefore the net does not appear to have any particular use or purpose.

There's a picture here which is of the first basketball court. The peach basket can be seen.

THE EXPERIMENT

Ok. Well. My SRP topic thing "Whether the absence or presence of a net affects free throw accuracy in basketball." I've come up with an experiment on how to test this. Hopefully it won't need too much changing but I have a feeling I might have to change one or two things. And I'll need volunteers. Lots of them.

EXPERIMENT:
AIM: To find whether the absence or presence of a net affects free throw accuracy in basketball.

HYPOTHESIS: The absence of a net decrease free throw accuracy in basketball.

EQUIPMENT: official NBA sized basketball, basketball court, basketball net, 30 people (15 experienced players, 15 non-experienced players), recording apparatus

METHOD:
1. Set up basketball court on a clear day, with net attached to hoop on the side facing away from the sun.
2. Have each person shoot at the hoop 10 times from the penalty line.
3. Take the net off the hoop.
4. Have each person shoot at the hoop ten times from the penalty line.
5. Record results, with a separate record for each person, with experience level noted.
6. Repeat the steps 1-5 two more times on different days but under the same conditions.
7. Compare and analyse all the results.

Hopefully, that will be the experiment I use to gather my information. I did do a bit of research and came across this site, which had a similar experiment on it, with the results.

http://www.usc.edu/CSSF/History/2006/Projects/JO334.pdf

The results on this site actually stated that the lack of a net resulted in greater free throw accuracy in basketball. I, however, think differently because I think that the net, which may not physically help a shooter, may help mentally focus the player's accuracy and help increase the shooting accuracy. And thus, my hypothesis. I will look further into this and perhaps find more sources to gather information from.

For now, that is all.

FINALLY

YES!! FINALLY!!

I have my SRP project thingy now. Courtesy to Ms Zhang, and my English class, and various other individuals, I have now made up my mind.

After I asked Ms Zhang about what topic thing was best, it turned out that the caffeine effects on bodies was too hard to do. I don't know what she thought of the telescope one though.
Well, anyways, it looked like I was left with 4 ideas:

• Whether the absence or presence of a net affects a free throw in basketball
• Whether watering a plant with caffeinated water affects the plant and whether watering a seed with caffeinated water affects germination
• How different erosional techniques affect different type os soil
• Whether storage temperature, area of storage, type of storage and time affect the pH level in different types of juice

Finally, it came down to the first and last of the points. The first won, by a narrow 10-9 win. So there it is. My SRP topic is:

Whether the absence or presence of a net affects a free throw in basketball.

So now I must formulate an experiment, but I have an idea of how I'll carry out the experiment. However, I shall put it up tomorrow, after I have refined the experiment. Must go now.

Bye!

RESEARCH: TELESCOPES

This doesn't mean I have chosen to do the telescope one. I' just looking into the stuff and doing research, and today I only had time to research one, because I procrastinate too much. =="
ANYWAYS, I just looked up "how to build a telescope" and came up with a handful of useful sites. One site was actually advertising a book on how to make 5 different telescopes. Man, I'd love to get my hands on that book! Anyways, I learnt that there were different types of telescopes. The discription on the site was as follows:

• 4"f/10 Reflector: A sturdy and easy-to-use telescope that is perfect for beginners or as parent/child projects
• 6"f/8 Dobsonian Reflector: A light, compact telescope, that is simple to build, but powerful enough to satisfy a backyard observer for many years
• 6"f/8 Equatorial Reflector: A classic design for the amateur astronomer or craftsman who wants an elegant telescope and great performance
• 10"f/6 Dobsonian Reflector: A powerful and versatile telescope suitable for casual stargazing or for a serious amateur's long-term observing program
• 6"f/15 Refractor: A large refractor that outperforms commercial telescopes of considerably larger aperture

Source: http://www.willbell.com/TM/tm2.htm

SO there are obviously different types of telescopes. And there are also different levels of telescope-building difficulty, and different levels of proficiency when made. I took a look at a couple of sites, which gave directions as to how to make a telescope. The sites were:

http://www.howstuffworks.com/question568.htm

http://www.funsci.com/fun3_en/tele/tele.htm#contents

There was another site, which was sort of like a journal on a person building a telescope.

http://www.buildingatelescope.com/construction.html

Another site, which I haven't been fully able to explore, but which looks promising with a variety of different telescope types on it, was this:

http://www.backyardvoyager.com/scopeplans.html

And IF I was to do this, I found a site with parts and prices on it, for buliding types of telescopes. Mught be handy.

http://www.telescopes-astronomy.com.au/telescope036.htm

Well, that's it for today. Time to go. I will be back soon. Bye!

AIYAH

Ok... despite my promises... I have not picked one yet!! Sigh... I haven't got a clue what is suitable or not. Maybe I'll ask Ms Zhang on Monday, because at the moment I'm stuck. Unless, of course, Ms Zhang comments.
Well, I've been doing a bit of research on each thing anyway. So...

• For the caffeine effects on the body, the independent variable is: time between when the coffee is drunk and when the tests are taken and finished; the dependent variables are: effect of the caffeine on the drinker; the controlled variables are: people chosen (regular coffee drinkers, non-regulars, non-drinkers), type of brew (cuppacino, latte, etc.), amount of caffeine and sugar and amount given to drink
• For the basketball net, the independent variable is: weather conditions; the dependent variables are: the number of hoops scored; the controlled variables are: the skill of the thrower, the position of the thrower, the presence of the net, the type of ring (double-ring or single-ring) and number of throws
• For the watering a plant with caffeinated water, the independent variable is: time; the dependent variables are: the rate of growth and effect of the caffeinated water on the plant; the controlled variables are: the amount of caffeine in the water, the type of plant, the amount watered and environment
• For the erosional effects on soils, the independent variable is: time; the dependent variables are: the effects of the erosional technique on the soil; the controlled variables are: the erosional techniques used and the type of soil
• For the pH of juices, the independent variable is: time; the dependent variables are: the resulting pH levels of the juice; the controlled variables are: the brand and type of juice, the storage temperature, the storage area and storage container

For the plant and caffeinated water idea, I might use seeds instead of plants, and measure the speed of germination and growth.

I don't really know what the independent, dependent and controlled variables are for building a telescope, maybe the materials used and so on.

I need to do more research on all these ideas. I'll start tomorrow, and hopefully I can work out something on what to do or whether the things I've said above are correct. But I must be going now, so...

Goodbye and goodnight! :)

ONE STEP CLOSER

Ok, I haven't decided what I want to do just yet, but I've set myself a deadline of tonight.
Tonight I shall have a SRP project.
I will do this! But I am one step closer, right now, to choosing an idea. It seems as if people like the idea "How caffeine affects the body - heart/pulse rate, breathing rate, body temperature, typing speed, typing accuracy, etc."
The few others that I have chosen to consider are:

• How and what materials are best to make a working telescope
• Whether the absence or presence of a net affects a free throw in basketball
• Whether watering a plant with water containing caffeine affects the plant, and whether watering a seed with caffeinated water affects germination
• How different erosional techniques affect different types of soil
• Whether storage temperature, area of storage, type of storage and time affect the pH level in different types of juice

So by tonight I WILL have the idea for my SRP. I'll be back :)

THINKING...

Hello again... Thanks to everyone who commented on my blog/post thingy! It's helping me a lot! I'm still not quite sure of what I should do... I don't really know what's suitable... Hmmm...
MS ZHANG, I NEED HELP!!
Anyways... yeah if people could just choose a few that they think are best for me to do for SRP I'd REALLY REALLY appreciate it!
My list was actually originally 50-something... so I've cut back a lot, but I can't decide out of these ideas. Any indication of what would be good to do or suitable to do would be great!
I shall come back soon, hopefully with a decision on what to do.

IDEAS FOR THE SRP

Well, I've been looking at ideas for a long time, and I've finally come across a few that I think are pretty interesting. Actually, originally I had a lot of ideas, and they generally fell into the categories of Biology, Chemistry and Engineering. These branched off into various branches, like health science, astronomy, environmental science and so on. I've been having trouble trying to narrow down my list of ideas but these are the ones I'm most interested in:

ENGINEERING:

• How and what materials are the best to make a working telescope
• How to build a sensor to detect the presence of a magnetic field
• How to make a working solar panel
• How to build a working electrochemical battery and how it can be made more efficient, with a highter output

HUMAN BODY:

• How caffeine affects the body - our typing speed and accuracy, body temperature, breathing rate, heart/pulse rate etc.
• Whether the absence or presence of a net affects a free throw in basketball
• Whether energy bars/energy drinks/sports drinks affect performance, and whether or not different energy bars have different levels of efficiency - affect reaction time, energy level etc.

PLANTS AND ENVIRONMENTAL:

• Whether magnetism affects the growth of a plant, and whether the position of the magnet or a magnetic field affects the plant growth or the germination of a plant
• Whether watering a plant with water containing caffeine affects the plant, and whether watering the seed with caffeinated water affects germination
• Whether ash can enhance plant growth and what plants grow best in ash and soil combined
• What chemicals affect algae in what ways, and what is best for algae to grow
• What different factors affect germination of a seed
• How different soils are affected by erosion OR how different erosional techniques affect a certain type of soil
• Whether pH of rain varies according to the season

FOOD:

• Whether different types of mould grow on different kind of bread, and what conditions cause what bacterial growth fastest etc.
• Whether storage temperature, type of storage, and time affect the pH of different kinds of juice
• Test bottled water for impurities and compare the impurities (e.g. lead) between different brands of bottled water, and whether there is evidence of leaching of hazardous chemicals from the plastics of the bottle over time

It's still a lot of ideas, but I am particularly interested in building something, like a telescope or a solar panel, but I'm not sure whether or not it's a good idea to choose something like that. The ideas above are the ones I like the most, but I don't know which to choose. If anyopne has any opinions or advice they can give me on what might be the best idea, I'd really appreciate it.

Hello World.

Hello world.